|
Welcome
Who are we?
COMPASSS activities
NEWS: training, meetings, publications
Bibliographical database
Software
Didactics: Boolean algebra and
QCA logic
Working papers
SmallN people
Useful links
CCM Textbook
|
Analysis and (fs)QCA software - applications
Philosophy - theology
1. SMILDE, David. "Who Commits? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis
of Pentecostal Conversion in Caracas." Lecture at University of Notre
Dame History Department: 2001.
2. ---. "Works of the Flesh, Fruit of the Spirit: Religious Action
Frames and Meaning Networks in Venezuelan Evangelicalism.". University
of Chicago, 2000.
Abstract: There are two recurring problems in the literature on Latin
American Evangelicalism. First, conversion is explained using a form of
functionalist explanation from results that both is not supported by contemporary
cultural theory and cannot adequately distinguish those who convert from
those who do not. Second, the political engagement of Latin American Evangelicals
has been seen as paradoxical and contradictory with some scholars arguing
that no consistent tendency can be discerned. This dissertation uses concepts
from the sociology of culture and social movements theory to work through
data from participant observation with Venezuelan Evangelicals, as well
as eighty-four life history interviews with Evangelical and non-Evangelical
men. The life history interviews with Evangelical men reveal that indeed
they largely converted as a means to overcome pressing problems with substance
abuse, violence and conjugal relationships. Evangelicalism functions as
“religious action frame” that orients and motivates action
that can overcome these problems. The data also reveal that men convert
in pursuit of these positive consequences. Existing theories of religion
rely on a realist theory of meaning that makes understanding such agency
difficult. Since only objectively valid beliefs can be used to bring about
desired consequences, such agency in religion has to be presented as knowledgeable
cynicism, unintelligent fluke, or as a process that works behind the actors’
backs. I suggest a pragmatic theory of meaning in which beliefs that are
not objectively valid in scientific terms can be held and used by actors
who only care about evidence of their practical effect.
I use Boolean algebra (Charles Ragin’s “qualitative comparative
analysis”) to compare cases of commitment with cases of non-commitment.
The analysis demonstrates that living with an Evangelical is a sufficient
cause of commitment. However, the numerically most important causal combination
is that of having serious life problems while not living with family of
origin. These conclusions underline the importance of meaning networks.
Having problems is important in most cases of commitment. But having the
opportunity to commit depends on being independent from family of origin
networks that reinforce traditional meanings, and or being in contact
with Evangelical networks through which meaning innovation can flow.
Conceiving of Evangelicalism as a frame containing an abstract symbolization
of supernatural agency at its center, but which does not necessarily contain
lower-level schemas consistently applying this symbolization to all areas
of life, can help us understand the variability in Evangelical politics.
While in areas of experience having to do with personal morality and the
family the Evangelical frame contains well articulated, lower-level schemas
that apply the abstract symbolization of supernatural agency to concrete
situations in consistent ways, in areas given less importance such as
politics, there are no well-articulated lower level schemas and individual
variation is the norm. However, when Evangelical morality or interests
are either openly embraced or openly threatened by a political option,
Evangelical leaders can actively mobilize their followers by presenting
well-articulated lower-level schemas containing the “correct”
application of the abstract symbolization of supernatural agency. In these
cases Evangelicalism can have an independent causal impact on political
processes.
_____________________________
Go to top
Last modified:
09-Oct-2007
|