COMParative methods for the Advancement of Systematic cross-case analysis and Small-n Studies

International ressource site

Welcome

Who are we?

COMPASSS activities

NEWS: training, meetings, publications

Bibliographical database

Software

Didactics: Boolean algebra and QCA logic

Working papers

SmallN people

Useful links

CCM Textbook

Other small N techniques - discussion and applications


1. ALASUUTARI, Pertti. "Beyond the Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction: Crosstabulation in Qualitative Research." International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 2 (1995): 251-68.

2. BERG-SCHLOSSER, Dirk. "COMPASSS Working Paper 2002-2: Macro-Quantitative Vs. Macro-Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences - Testing Empirical Theories of Democracy.", 2002.
Abstract: There are some new attempts to bridge the divide between quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences. My paper explicitely illustrates and tests some of these methods like regression, cluster, or discriminant analysis, on the one hand, and more recent case- and diversity-oriented methods like QCA, Fuzzy Sets and similar ones, on the other. This is done by using examples and data for different empirical theories of democracy such as those by Lipset, Vanhanen, or Moore/Stephens. In this way, the specific strengths and weakenesses of the respective methods and theories are demonstrated.

3. ---. "Macro-Quantitative Vs Macro-Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences - Testing Empirical Theories of Democracy." Colloque de la Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée "Faire de la politique comparée au 21eme siecle" Atelier 2:outils méthodologiques: 2002.
Abstract: There are some few attempts to bridge the divide between quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences. This paper explicitely illustrates and tests some of these methods like regression, cluster, or discriminant analysis, on the one hand, and more recent case- and diversity-oriented methods like QCA, Fuzzy Sets and similar ones, on the other. This is done by using examples and data for different empirical theories of democracy such as those by Lipset, Vanhanen, or Moore/Stephens. In this way, the specific strenghts and weaknesses of the respective methods and theories are demonstrated.

4. CHOMPALOV, Ivan Michailov. "Multi-Institutional Collaborations in Science: Structure, Types, and Outcomes.". Louisiana State University, 1998.
Abstract: The advent of modern 'big science' brings about a new kind of research formation: multi-institutional collaborations involving teams of researchers from several organizations. Despite their recent proliferation and visibility, no general classification of these 'virtual organizations' exists. This study adopts a macrosociological, comparative perspective to develop a variety of classification schemes that capture the systematic variation of interorganizational collaborations in science along basic structural dimensions and to examine the relationships of these classifications with important sociological outcomes. Qualitative, historical analysis of collaborations in high-energy physics, space science, and geophysics showed that, when we set aside field-specific differences, seven general dimensions emerge as fundamental in describing the structural variety of collaborations in science: project formation, magnitude, organization and management, interdependence, participation, communication, and technological practice. Cluster analysis was then employed using interview data from 23 recent collaborations in five new areas of physics and allied sciences to build classification schemes along these structural dimensions. Next, analysis of variance models and qualitative comparative analysis were used to explore how the classifications relate to valued sociological outcomes such as success, trust, conflict, stress, and documentary routines. The empirical results strongly supported the central argument that a typology based on a broad conception of technological practice is superior to others in its ability to predict the patterned consequences of multi-institutional collaborations in science. In fact, it is the only clustering that is capable of explaining perceived success, trust, and stress. The major findings of the dissertation research suggest that it is necessary to move away from the narrow focus on the laboratory and the disciplinary organization of R&D in order to capture the structure.

5. GRIFFIN, Larry J. "Narrative, Event-Structure Analysis and Causal Interpretation in Historical Sociology." American Journal of Sociology 98.5 (1993): 1094-133.

6. ---. "Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology : an Introduction." Sociological Methods and Research 20 (1992): 403-27.

7. GRIFFIN, Larry J., et al. "Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity : Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union Growth and Decline." Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. ed. Charles C. RAGIN. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1991. 110-36.

8. GRIFFIN, Larry J., and Charles C. RAGIN. "Some Observations on Formal Methods of Qualitative Analysis." Sociological Methods and Research 23.1 (1994): 1-12.

9. HAGFORS, Robert, and Olli KANGAS. "Neural Computation As a Clustering Method for Comparative Welfare State Research." ESPAnet 2004 Conference, Comparative Methodology Stream: 2004.

10. HAMPEL, Frank R., et al. Robust Statistics. The Approach Based on Influence Functions. New York: J.Wiley, 1986.

11. HAWLEY, Joshua D. "Media Review: Rihoux B. & Grimm H. (2006). Innovative Comparative Mehtods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Qauntitative-Qualitative Divide. New-York: Springer ." Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1.4 (2007): 390-92.

12. HEISE, David R. "Computer Assistance in Qualitative Sociology." Social Science Computer Review 10.4 (1992): 531-43.
Abstract: Software for analyzing qualitative data is emerging simultaneously with a resurgence of formal methods for qualitative analysis, giving contemporary sociologists unprecedented control over qualitative research projects. This article focuses on computer methods of text analysis and on software for building "logic models" that systematize interpretations of empirical data. Content analysis, network analysis, and image analysis are mentioned as additional growth areas in computer-assisted qualitative research.

13. ---. "Modeling Event Structures." Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14 (1989): 139-69.
Abstract: Other technique : Event Structure Analysis (ESA)

14. HOYLE, R. H. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. London: Sage, 1999.

15. HUBER, Günter L. Analysis of Qualitative Data With AQUAD Five for Windows. Schwangau: Ingeborg Huber Verlag, 1997.

16. Huber, Günter L. AQUAD Five. Vers. 5.8. Schwangau: Ingeborg Huber Verlag, 1999.

17. JANOSKI, Thomas. "Synthetic Strategies in Comparative Sociological Research : Methods and Problems of Internal and External Analysis." Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. ed. Charles C. RAGIN. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1991. 59-81.

18. JANOSKI, Thomas, and Alexander M. HICKS, eds. The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

19. KANOMATA, Nobuo. "Yogen no Jikozyouzyu Moderu [A model of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy]." Shituteki Hikaku Bunseki [Qualitative Comparative Analysis]. eds Nobuo KANOMATA, Daishiro NOMIYA, and Keiji HASEGAWA. Kyoto: Mineruva Syobo, 2001.

20. KILBURN, Witht H. "Explaining U.S. Urban Regimes: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis." Urban Affairs Review .39 (2004): 663-51.

21. LAGUECIR, Aziza. "Practices of Cost Planning and Management Tools in NPD Process: a Quali-Comparative Approach." Druid Winter Conference: 2003.

22. LESTHAEGHE, Ron. "Beyond Economic Reductionism : the Transformation of the Reproductive Regimes in France and Belgium in the 18th and 19th Centuries." Fertility Transitions, Family Structure and Population Policy. ed. Calvin GOLDSCHNEIDER. Boulder & San Francisco: Westview Press, 1992. 1-44.

23. LESTHAEGHE, Ron, et al. "Post-Partum Abstinence, Polygyny, and Age at Marriage : a Macro-Level Analysis of Sub-Saharian Societies." Nuptiality in Sub-Saharian Africa. eds C. BLEDSOC and G. PISON. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. 25-54.

24. LEVI, Margaret. "Analytic Narratives and Other Systematic and Rigorous Ways to Do Case Study and Qualitative Comparative Research (Course Syllabus, University of Washington).", 2001.

25. MAHONEY, James. "Comparative-Historical Methods: The State of the Art. Lecture for the COMPASSS Meeting, 25-6 November 2004, Leuven.", 2004.

26. ---. "Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis." American Journal of Sociology 104.4 (1999): 1154-96.

27. MILES, Matthew B., and A. Michael HUBERMAN. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd revised ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.

28. MILES, Matthew B., and Eben A. WEITZMAN. "Appendix. Choosing Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis." Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook. Matthew B. MILES and A. Michael HUBERMAN. 2nd revised ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994. 311-17.

29. RANTALA, Kati, and Eeva HELLSTRÖM. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis - a Hermeneutic Approach to Interview Data." International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4.2 (2001): 87-100.

30. RANTALA, Kati, and Eeva HELLSTRÖM. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis and a Hermeneutic Approach to Interview Data." Fourth ISA World Congress of Sociology, Session ‘The Computerized Analysis of Textual Records’: 1998.

31. RIHOUX, Benoit, and Sakura YAMASAKI. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Multi-Value QCA (MVQCA) on Blind Data: Come Explorations and Critical Comments.", 2005.

32. SICAKKAN, Hakan Gürcan, and Atilla E. GÜNHAN. "Neural Networks As an Alternative Model in System Identification Paradigm: A Comparison of Statistics, Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Neural Networks As Tools of System Identification." Reports in Information Science (Bergen, Institutt for Informasjonsvitenskap, Universitetet i Bergen) (1995).

33. WEITZMAN, Eben A., and Matthew B. MILES. Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.

34. ZEKIC, Marijana. "Neural Network Applications in Stock Market Predictions. A Methodology Analysis.", 1998.

Go to top


Last modified: 09-Oct-2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benoît RIHOUX, Centre de Politique Comparée

Gisèle DE MEUR, Lab. de recherche en MAThématiques et sciences humaines Geert VAN HOOTEGEM, Afdeling Arbeids- en Organisatiesociologie Peter BURSENS, Onderzoeksgroep Internationale Politiek